Thanks for accepting my invite. Those of us who have faith need no further proof of creation. Those who need proof of our Lords existence will find it, but I am sorry to say it will be to late. I can say this the Lord can get your attention, He got mine. The only porblem is when He knocks you must answer the door. Alan you have a great week. Your friend in Christ, Bill G.

Hi Alan, If Kairusan can show me a human fossil with a tail or a fish fossil with feet I might rethink evolution. Whether he believes in the Lord or not, he like me will be judged on how he lived his life on earth.My prayer is that he will find the Lord before he meets him. I like your channel my friend. Visit mine anytime. Your friend in Christ, Bill G.

Hi Alan,
I'm not here to debate but just to say that I too am a Christian. There are many things about creation, God, God's love and the bible that I don't understand. But as a Christian, I know that God's son became flesh and walked amongst us. He suffered and died for our sins. He rose again on the 3rd day. If we will accept this sacrifice and believe on Him we will be saved. Take care and God bless. Lloyd

Part 72: I challenge you to read The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution by Professor Richard Dawkins, consider it, and then respond to the main arguments in the book—if you can. If you agree to do this, and can provide an opposing book that disproves evolution, then I will read it, consider it, research it if necessary, and respond to it. If you want a book by a scientist thats confident and not full of we believe and it could and so forth, then the book I recommended is your best bet.

Sorry for the flood of e-mails. Itd be easier if we were messaging since those limits are more lenient. Hope everyone over there is doing well.

Part 71: Ive done a good job of defending the scientific community and Im not even a scientist yet. If a doctor of science was to debate you (though I doubt theyd have time to debate a Creationist on long-disproven things) they would cover a much larger gamut and would be better equipped at disproving your arguments. However, Im still able to do so as a layman engineering student who has mainly experience in the fields of Physics, Chemistry, and Biology—Im also using my knowledge of Philosophy and Religion, but thats for the unscientific arguments. This is how powerful science is, even I can defend it with my somewhat limited knowledge of the field.

Part 70: Im probably missing some things you still havent proven on your side, but I think you MIGHT get the picture. Youre assuming youre right because...wellyou just are—and thats that. You have yet to provide any arguments founded on facts and not be disproven. (Ex: the evolution of the fetus argument that was disproven)

I shouldnt be the only one bearing the burden of proof.

(imagine every asterisk (*) starts a new line with a sub point for each number.) Stupid YouTube comment limits....

Part 69(sorry, had to cram it together): 1. God created the universe. *God exists (good luck)
2. God is the God of the Bible. *The other possible God(s)/Goddess(es) cannot exist. (this may take a while. Include FSM.) *The Bible is infallible. (this will also take a lot of effort) *God really did speak through the humans who wrote it.
3. The Earth is X years old. (where X is what you think it is. 10,000? 6,000?) *the scientific evidence is wrong.
4. We didnt evolve. *the overwhelming scientific evidence is wrong. (thisll take a while for you to disprove) *micro-evolution isnt macro-evolution.
5. Prove that the things science cant answer yet can be fully answered (not by saying God did it.) by religion

Part 68: Finally, you keep trying to say I think this is all Just a big accident and I dont. Stop trying to put words in my mouth. I already explained multiple times that its not just an accident.

You know, Ive been defending my arguments for sciences explanation for everything including the unsure things like creation of our universe or evolution of the eye—but you have yet to defend your position. Ive provided evidence and proofs for my arguments but I have yet to see any for your side. How about you provide evidence or proof for the following (the tabbed points below are things youll need to prove first for the main argument to be proven) (next part):

Part 67: Heres your other problem: Youre assuming we started 4.5 billion years ago (or whatever ridiculously short time ago you think the Earth was created) with the complexity we have now. That is not the case. It started out extremely simple (primitive DNA) then evolved to be complex over a large amount of time.

Why do cells have to be simple? Of course theyre complex. That doesnt prove anything against evolutionary theory. In fact, evolutionary theory can explain where all those complexities came from and what they were like in the past. You NEED science to even try and argue against it. Youre using scientific facts to try and argue God when the reality is: youre making a huge (and illogical) jump when you do that.

Also, why didnt God make each of our cells individual? Why are there replications of cells if God did it? Why arent we near-perfect beings if we were made in Gods image? Science explains our flaws, the Bible doesnt.