The Background image was released on March 9, 2004 by Hubble Space Telescope using their Ultra Deep Field camera (ACS) and (NICMOS). It was a 11.3 day exposure equivalent to looking through a 8.00 ft straw at a dark empty portion of the heavens. The camera was predicted to find only a dusty area without any stars or anything at a distance nearly 13 billion light years away. According to Relativity; i.e., nothing can go faster than the speed of light the camera should not have imaged galaxies as pixels (shown as tiny red dots in the background).

As you can see the universe extends further than what was predicted by the age of our universe @ 13.7 billion years.

The tiny, faint red galaxies were estimated to be 13.5 billion light years away, see red shift. If it takes 13.5 billion years for light to travel that distance how is it we see large old galaxies? The Hubble Ultra Deep Field is called a "pencil beam" survey because the observations encompass a narrow, yet "deep" piece of sky thus why astronomers compare the Ultra Deep Field view to looking through an eight-foot-long straw.

Also, if an object traveling at the speed of light has no time then is the photon timeless or is it the quantum entanglement between the photon and the source timeless? Quantum entanglement seems to be the reason.

That would mean we are not able to see the light from a distance star as it was emitted in the past. When the wave collapses to form light (electrons) the information of the source is transmitted via the potential wave in an instant, see quantum entanglement experiments. Even recent finding of large galaxies where small ones should be if the Big Bang did happen. It appears there is no way to look back into time.

I am a pantheist. I believe in one God under heaven, the natural creator of all matter and energy in this universe.

See my video Science finds God.
The video explains the evidence found that supports the existence of God.

http://www.youtube.com/watc... See my video Gravity 1 & 2.
When gravity is added as the work force in the formula for thermodynamics it violates the law of conservation. Workforce = Heat, heat is energy. This shows that new energy (HEAT) is produced from gravity at the cores of large bodies in space, planets & stars.

Is this the detailed quantum mechanism responsible for the universe's inflation?

Observations also tell us that there was not one big bang but many petite ones all across this universe. See 2df Sky Survey and Huchra's Cosmic Bubbles. Then, when gravity is added as the work force,.. the video explains everything.

This hypothesis explains why the universe is expanding & why the galaxies furthest from us are accelerating away at nearly the speed of light. No need to add dark energy to fit observations, for reference to dark energy see inflation theory.

This however is all conjecture. If gravity is an effect of mass and mass never gets smaller, see accretion, then the heat would continue forever, adding new energy (heat) to a cold universe; not an extremely hot beginning like predicted but a cold empty one, causing expansion, not from one point but from each point that contained particles. This explains the observations.

Energy can be transformed into matter, see pair production, energy transfers into matter at 90° of it's magnetic field where energy can slow to a stop m=E/c². This is located directly on the equator of all magnetic fields. Gravity is the cause for solar systems and galaxies forming and creates new matter on a disk like plane around radioactive planets (Jovian) only along the electromagnetic ecliptic of radioactive planets and stars.

Heavier elements can form out of high energetic gamma rays when the energy collides with our magnetosphere. Like tiny soap bubbles being blown into larger ones, out pops tiny particles. See the Earth's Van Allen belts where positive protons and negative electrons are located, a.k.a., elementary particles. This also happens where EM fields collide head on.

See my 2012 video:
The last cosmic event happened nearly 13,000 years ago, half of a full precession of the equinoxes. Strange too because our solar system is moving in alignment with the galactic equator and the gamma rays that we receive emanating along the galactic equator are getting stronger every year, See Physicists find evidence of high energetic photons concentrated along the galactic equator, links are in all the video descriptions.

Will this cosmic wave transform into gold particles, Golden Age? Are the cosmic hot spots found just outside our solar system only reflecting the energy emanating from the galactic core? Is this why it is difficult to determine the source of the cosmic energy? See Cosmic Hot Spots.

My gravity theory along with pair production, matter transforming out of energy, implies that the universe started off with nothing, possibly only consciousness, See Vogelsang's STI device, then now everything is here and appears to be continually growing. See Neil Adams Growing Earth.

Current theory cannot explain where all the heat came from to start the Big Bang. I propose that the universe started out cold and was heated up to it's current temperature via the effects of gravity and will continue to get warmer.

Particles only contain kinetic energy when they are moving. When the particle hits an object the kinetic energy is lost yet the force of gravity is still being applied to that particle. So when gravity is inserted as the work force over unity is created in the form of heat, concentrated at the cores of each body in space.

The Earth and all other bodies grow. Observations are showing this. If scientific evidence is based on observations then why has this been overlooked? An observation is a fact, ignoring the facts is called ignorance. It appears Science is not about truth but continues to grow from idealist views.