Where's your video? I been waiting ;)

Ok no worries.May i ask then what fields you are currently studying ?

Hi there.I was wondering if you have any qualifications in the field of evolutionary biology geology,paleontology
or any other fields related to the videos you make.This is not a leading question i am simply trying to compile a list of qualified youtubers.

When you making a new video poppet?

Found you through an EvoBiologist mirror about the fascism slander on atheists/ evolutionists. Your uploads may be dated but are very good! Subbed

Your english is obviusly too bad to discuss this in depth with you and even if you were fluent you don't understand what a monkey is and why we not only descended from them but are them now.

To answer your disingenuous question. Yes. It is impossible for an educated and honest person to believe otherwise when confronted with the evidence

r u really believe the people were monkeys ??

"Molecular biologist Michael Denton wrote"

Michael Denton's poorly written "book" was panned thoroughly and universally by biologists for containing multiple rudimentary errors. The particular quote you chose is even more tragic because it is entirely irrelevent to anything and doesn't make any argument at all in favour of anything you are trying to assert!

It is also worth pointing out that Denton now accepts evolution and in his book "Nature's Destiny" points out how utterly wrong creationism is. He still makes outlandish claims (that of a teleological evolution) but he now accepts the evidence relevent to evolution.

Why did you quote him?

"when their is a mountain of evidence to suggest the earth is young. "

Whoever told you this is lying and by repeating it when you could so easily cross-check ts accuracy and show it to be false. You are nothing short of lying yourself. This again is a testament to yor dishonesty.

Oh well. At least you aren't trying to peddle irrelevent quotes I've already addressed anymore...

Oh wait, you are

"This is faith position made with many assumption piled onto assumptions. It requires that the earth be 4.5 billion years old... when their is a mountain of evidence to suggest the earth is young."

Nothing about this statement is accurate. Evolution doesn't "Require" the Earth to be 4.56Gya, first of all an Old Earth was determined scientifically centuries before the theory of evolution. The absolute dating figure came from a variety of different methods which cross confirm one another and pass double blind testing.