Profile
Channel Views:
22,952
Total Upload Views:
43,138
Age:
52
Joined:
Feb 21, 2009
Latest Activity:
3 days ago
It's upsetting that one of man's greatest achievements has been gradually undermined by the ridiculous notion that the Moon landings were somehow faked. I think people who believe this outrageous conspiracy theories do so because they are unsatisfied with their lives.They want to believe that someone else is in control.
Come on people. Astronauts on wires? Secret moonstudios in Area 51? Faked radio- and television transmissions? Faked moonrocks?
Think of the BEST special effects movies that you have ever seen. Now think of the inconsistensies or visual errors that even the casual uninformed audience can see in these films.
Now think back to 1969 and the movies that were made then. Could NASA have produced such fakery that it would not only stand up to the scrutiny of a 1969 audience, but also a whole generation of engineers and scientists familiar with the geologic studies of celestial bodies?
Most people are smart enough to believe reputable engineers, physicists, geologists, astronomers and astronauts from across the globe who state that the landings were a fact. But no, the real conspiracists believe some anonymous high-school dropouts who found everything they needed to conclude the Apollo program was a hoax from some distorted YouTube videos.
The evidence of Apollo has been in the public domain for 42 years now. Photographs, images of spacecraft taken by astronauts in other spacecraft, as well as images of the spacecraft heading towards the moon by telescopes from earth, broadcasts in real-time and seen in real-time, scientific experiments placed on the moon, rocks and samples returned from the moon, exams of the chemical makeup of the rocks, isotopic abundances, cosmic ray exposure ages, radioactive dating techniques and more.
The Apollo program was the biggest achievement of the century. Neil Armstrong, Edwin Aldrin, Charles Conrad, Alan Bean, Alan Shepard, Edgar Mitchell, David Scott, James Irwin, John Young, Charles Duke, Gene Cernan and Harrison Schmitt walked on the moon. Science, damn good engineering and a lot of courage made it happen.
Come on people. Astronauts on wires? Secret moonstudios in Area 51? Faked radio- and television transmissions? Faked moonrocks?
Think of the BEST special effects movies that you have ever seen. Now think of the inconsistensies or visual errors that even the casual uninformed audience can see in these films.
Now think back to 1969 and the movies that were made then. Could NASA have produced such fakery that it would not only stand up to the scrutiny of a 1969 audience, but also a whole generation of engineers and scientists familiar with the geologic studies of celestial bodies?
Most people are smart enough to believe reputable engineers, physicists, geologists, astronomers and astronauts from across the globe who state that the landings were a fact. But no, the real conspiracists believe some anonymous high-school dropouts who found everything they needed to conclude the Apollo program was a hoax from some distorted YouTube videos.
The evidence of Apollo has been in the public domain for 42 years now. Photographs, images of spacecraft taken by astronauts in other spacecraft, as well as images of the spacecraft heading towards the moon by telescopes from earth, broadcasts in real-time and seen in real-time, scientific experiments placed on the moon, rocks and samples returned from the moon, exams of the chemical makeup of the rocks, isotopic abundances, cosmic ray exposure ages, radioactive dating techniques and more.
The Apollo program was the biggest achievement of the century. Neil Armstrong, Edwin Aldrin, Charles Conrad, Alan Bean, Alan Shepard, Edgar Mitchell, David Scott, James Irwin, John Young, Charles Duke, Gene Cernan and Harrison Schmitt walked on the moon. Science, damn good engineering and a lot of courage made it happen.
Country:
Netherlands
Subscriptions
(45)
Channel Comments
Subscribers
(167)
He believes ...
That richard gages " scientific building collapse video " where he uses cardboard boxes to simulate the WTC towers on fire , hit by a plane and weighing thousands of tons .... to be a scientifically correct representation.
He even said the same test could be done with paddle pop stick towers and still be scientific ....
pay little attention to him , as with many conspiracy theorists , his narcisism flares when confronted by different ideas / opinions that he can not sway to his liking .