Profile
Channel Views:
40,031
Total Upload Views:
51,900
Age:
23
Joined:
Mar 2, 2010
Last Visit Date:
2 hours ago
Subscribers:
1,017
About Me:
Im glad you have ended up here and found my little, humble corner of youtube.
I like to read books and listen to people talking.
I like to be informed and like to inform.
I prefer humble, respectfull, polite people who aren't emotive but driven by a desire to see truth which is beyond false dichotamies like good and evil.
I welcome correction and are rather corrected by people who have an interest in correcting me, not lectuing me, as do most people. Im certainly not special in this regard.
Philosophically:
Im interested in Plato, Evola, Marcus Garvey and have a fascination with Beyondism.
I admire:
Rushton & Jensen
As for the political:
I call myself apolitical.
I advocate free association, that includes right (privelege to dissassociation).
I dont like the state. I dont like war.
I dont like mainstream media.
I dont like popular-culture and art.
I think people should hold whatever beliefs they want as long as it doesn't threaten others to hold their beliefs.
This has led me to believe in an geographically-divided-ideolog
My observation tells me that people prefer the company of others who are like themselves and who think like themselves as the society will reflect their values, their goals and compromisses wont have to be made. Societies will have less dissidents objecting and there will be less growing friction leading to more and new compromisses.
Ideologies, cultures and peoples can compete and diverge.
A return to natural selection.
That's some facts about me.
Country:
Faroe Islands
Schools:
Ethnology
Law-school
Interests:
Books
Movies:
Movies:
Band of Brothers
The Mighty
Shows:
Friends,
Allo Allo,
Robin of Sherwood (84-86)
Music:
Enya, U2, Nena, Men at work
Books:
Steven Pinker - Blank Slate
Snyderman/Rothman - The IQ Controvery
M Hart - Understanding Human history
Arthur R Jensen - The g factor
Subscribers
(1017)
ANYWAY, here's a link for your pleasure: /watch?v=1eHUcVYBCZo
James.
I'd rather look at it this way.
It's not that you are weak, quite the opposite, it's rather that I am very strong. : )
"Part of the problem is that I've been doing outdoor work (lawns, planting, landscaping, etc) and by the time Im done I have no energy for the gym (so it's not me fault, see ; )"
Here come the excuses, hehe ; P
No, but seriously, I know.
You are overtraining your muscles.
Skype?
Even other than regarding 'how it all ends' there is something that will attract more people to the cause of physical reality (our cause) by looking healthy and strong. It's instinctive, which is why the media likes to make us look weak and our adversaries look strong.
Seriously?
Well, I am famous for my Military presses.
My Best friend always suck at hidding his emotions. You can really see him get irritated/jealous when I do them. He's not even close and he started one year prior to me.
"That might make a bigger difference in some ways than having all the best arguments."
Im certain of it, because of how I predict, things will end.
Satanism är väldigt fysisk och materialistisk, medan Traditionalism ser värdet i transcendens och den metafysiska effekten detta har i den materialistiska världen. Traditionalism menar samtidigt att man skall skapa ideologier och världsperspektiv, inte baserat på vad man är emot, men vad man är för. Därmed är, exempelvis, "Anti-Stat" en dålig titel på en ideologi och världsbild, medan "Voluntarist" är en bättre benämning.
Likaså är Satanist en titel grundad på en kontrast och lägger värdet på vad den är emot, inte vad den är för.
Satanism är relativt positiv i den mening att den är individualistisk och därmed borde motsätta sig en marxistisk planekonomi, samt ras-kvoteringar. Å andra sidan är en ideologiskt förankrad individualism negativ då vi som ras är mest o-organiserade och just nu betalar priset för det. Viss satanism tillämpar även "Might is right", vilket torde vara positivt då detta motsätter sig vänsterns vädjan till moraliseringar. Å andra sidan ursäktar den även Euopéernas nedfall och tar inte inneboende ställning. Det är därmed ur detta perspektiv en onödig ideologisk titel, ämnad för tillfällig ideologisk flykt i de yngre åren, då den inte fyller något ideelt syfte.