This time its Real. I HATE PEOPLE WHO SPAM ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ROAR!

April 27, 2009

DUaXFpAboTc

Chill It is a JOKE! The real One is Comeing out tmr night. Or monday.

April 25, 2009

uKf3EQHaIyk

o7YuLiieJWg

The Title Makes me sound High.........I AM NOT! Here I interview Cloud4an:

http://www.youtube.com/user/cl oud4an

April 24, 2009

DUaXFpAboTc

Great videos check him out.

Note: I will promote your channel if you meantion me in your vids. I did child's because he is a friend.

Or at least I like to think of him as a friend

October 07, 2008

jb77WrRi91E

(Michael Kotaridis) A boy takes a photo of a man and slowly is consumed by the mans soul.

February 13, 2007

QuhqHOPyXSg

jb77WrRi91E

(Michael Kotaridis) A boy takes a photo of a man and slowly is consumed by the mans soul.

February 13, 2007

jb77WrRi91E

http://digg.com/politics/CONSP IRACY_7
Please digg if you like this video.

I want to make one thing perfectly clear, just because a person looks at the possibility of a conspiracy doesn't mean they believe every single conspiracy that comes around. The point of this video is to show that things that before they were public knowledge, would have been called a conspiracy theory. People need to do their own research and just because you have an open mind about other theories then the general public accepts doesn't mean you just believe anything without the proper research.

Here are the links to the conspiracies listed in the video. These may not be the best links, but it is not my job to do your research for you. You need to find out all the available information yourself. This is just to get you some idea of the stories related to this video

Smallpox Blankets
http://www.nativeweb.org/pages /legal/amherst/lord_jeff.html

Chicago Black Sox
http://www.chicagohs.org/histo ry/blacksox.html

General Motors Street Car
http://www.lovearth.net/gmdeli beratelydestroyed.htm

Overthrow FDR
http://american_almanac.tripod .com/smedley.htm

Reichstag fire
http://www.historyplace.com/wo rldwar2/riseofhitler/burns.htm

Manhattan Project
http://www.atomicmuseum.com/To ur/manhattanproject.cfm

Quiz Show scandal
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/q uizshow/

Operation Northwoods
http://www.whatreallyhappened. com/northwoods.html

Gulf of Tonkin
http://www.fair.org/index.php? page=2261

Watergate
http://www.watergate.info/

Neslon Bunker Hunt & Silver Thursday
http://www.time.com/time/magaz ine/article/0,9171,920875,00.h tml

Iran Contra
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/r eagan/peopleevents/pande08.htm l

Enron & Aurthur Anderson
http://www.whatreallyhappened. com/enron.html

Kennedy Assassination
http://www.abc.net.au/worldtod ay/stories/s68076.htm
There are probably more articles on this subject then any other mentioned. You can also see the movie JFK among many other films made on the subject.


Tuskegee Syphilis scandal
http://www.usrf.org/uro-video/ Tuskegee_2004/Article_Header.j pg
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/f ullpage.html?res=9D0DE5D91039F 931A25756C0A961958260
http://www.cdc.gov/tuskegee/ti meline.htm

We should never stop asking questions regarding events that appear in any way suspicious. If they have nothing to hide, then there should be no problem answering questions and giving the proper respect to either clear the names of the accused or indict them for crimes committed. Either way, people should never feel as if they should not ask the people in power the tough questions that need honest answers.

------------------------------ ------
Copyright information: None of my videos are copyrighted, provided that you do not edit the video in any way and do not place any form of advertisement on the video. The video cannot be altered in any way from its published form. If someone wants to re-upload my video on their channel they must put a link to my channel and the original video so people can find the original source for the content. If you have any questions please contact me before downloading my video. Thank you.

The Real Weekly News

June 28, 2008

GJbCWJNQUYI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =-NjnsLQCl_w
http://digg.com/world_news/VIA COM_VS_YOU
Please digg to help support this video

The Judge"

Judge Louis L Stanton
Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse
United States Courthouse
500 Pearl St., Room 2250
New York, NY10007

Phones
(212) 805-0252

Faxes
(212) 805-0389

Online Petition:
http://www.petitiononline.com/ privacy9/petition.html


Viacom vs you. Google must divulge the viewing habits of every user who has ever watched any video on YouTube, a US court has ruled.

The ruling comes as part of Google's legal battle with Viacom over allegations of copyright infringement.

Digital rights group the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) called the ruling a "set-back to privacy rights".

The viewing log, which will be handed to Viacom, contains the log-in ID of users, the computer IP address (online identifier) and video clip details.

While the legal battle between the two firms is being contested in the US, it is thought the ruling will apply to YouTube users and their viewing habits everywhere.

The UK's Premier League association is also seeking class action status with Viacom on the issue, alleging YouTube, which was bought by Google in 2006, has been used to watch football highlights.

Following the launch of its billion-dollar lawsuit, YouTube
The US court declined Viacom's request that Google be forced to hand over the source code of YouTube, saying it was a "trade secret" that should not be disclosed.

But it said privacy concerns expressed by Google about handing over the log were "speculative".

Google's senior litigation counsel Catherine Lacavera said in a statement: "We are disappointed the court granted Viacom's over-reaching demand for viewing history.

"We will ask Viacom to respect users' privacy and allow us to anonymise the logs before producing them under the court's order."

The ruling will see the viewing habits of millions of YouTube users given to Viacom, totalling more than 12 terabytes of data.

Viacom said it wanted the data to "compare the attractiveness of allegedly infringing video with that of non-infringing videos."

YouTube and Google had "compelled" it to go to court, Viacom said, "by continuing to defend their illegal and irresponsible conduct and profiting from copyright infringement, when they could be implementing the safe and legal user generated content experience they promise".

It said it would not be asking for any "personally identifiable information" of any user.

"Any information that we or our outside advisors obtain will be used exclusively for the purpose of proving our case against You Tube and Google (and) will be handled subject to a court protective order and in a highly confidential manner."

'Erroneous ruling'

Leading privacy expert Simon Davies told BBC News that the privacy of millions of YouTube users was threatened.

He said: "The chickens have come home to roost for Google.

"Their arrogance and refusal to listen to friendly advice has resulted in the privacy of tens of millions being placed under threat."

Mr Davies said privacy campaigners had warned Google for years that IP addresses were personally identifiable information.

Google pledged last year to anonymise IP addresses for search information but it has said nothing about YouTube data.

Mr Davies said: "Governments and organisations are realising that companies like Google have a warehouse full of data. And while that data is stored it is under threat of being used and putting privacy in danger."

The EFF said: "The Court's erroneous ruling is a set-back to privacy rights, and will allow Viacom to see what you are watching on YouTube.

"We urge Viacom to back off this overbroad request and Google to take all steps necessary to challenge this order and protect the rights of its users."

The body said the ruling was also potentially unlawful because the log data did contain personally identifiable data.

------------------------------ ------
Copyright information: None of my videos are copyrighted, provided that you do not edit the video in any way and do not place any form of advertisement on the video. The video cannot be altered in any way from its published form. If someone wants to re-upload my video on their channel they must put a link to my channel and the original video so people can find the original source for the content. If you have any questions please contact me before downloading my video. Thank you.

The Real Weekly News

The court also ruled that Google disclose to Viacom the details of all videos that have been removed from the site for any reason.

July 05, 2008

rRuoL0UYG-Y

6EzD7Tb0pgU

KEEP A GOOD EYE ON THE HONORS FOR THIS VIDEO! THE LAST FEW HAVE BEEN VERY SLOW TO UPDATE!

IN CASE ANYTHING HAPPENS TO MY YOUTUBE CHANNEL, ADD ME AS A FRIEND ON MYSPACE:
http://profile.myspace.com/rea lweeklynews

Here are my other videos on Viacom:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =GJbCWJNQUYI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =-NjnsLQCl_w
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =iL-F1ZCxH0E
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =RuWVMB7OxbM

Viacom appears to have abused their ability to remove videos and entire channels through copyright claims. While I have always agreed that their property should be protected and should be removed if they needed it to be. This time they crossed the line. Actually they have done this many times before. Here is a link to one of their most abusive copyright issues in the past:
http://theknightshift.blogspot .com/2007/08/viacom-hits-me-wi th-copyright.html

This is not the only time Viacom has acted very aggressively with people on the internet. They do this because they are a large corporation and think they can get away with it. For the most part they have.

Recently some trigger happy person at Viacom took down the video Viacom vs you from youtube. It was obvious to everyone that there was absolutely no copyright issue with that video whatsoever. Yet it was still removed. Most videos that are taken down unjustly never see the light of day again. I am only back up now because of all the support from my viewers.

This is not just a Viacom problem, it is also a youtube problem. Anyone can accuse any channel anytime for copyright infringement. It is up to the accused to prove their innocence rather then the accusor. From what I have seen there are no severe penalties for a false copyright claim made by a channel or a business. Channels and businesses that make more then one false copyright claim need to be punished severely for their actions. This is a very serious subject on youtube and around the net. This has happened multiple times to many different channels.

There is also no distinction between a copyright infringing video and a video dealing with fair use.

TRADE MARK / COPYRIGHT INFO:
Trademarks and "service marks" — are governed in the U.S. by the federal Lanham Act, along with various different laws in the individual states. The basic purpose of trademark law is to protect consumers by enabling them to rely on recognizable marks to identify the source of goods and services.

It follows that unless there is a likelihood that the unauthorized use of a trademark or service mark will confuse consumers, there is no violation of trademark law. In many cases, courts don't need to address fair use or other possible defenses because there is no real likelihood of confusion.

But trademark rights are closely related to a number of other rights, and trademark owners will also frequently make claims about "dilution", "passing off", "unfair competition", or the "right of publicity".

"Trademark dilution" lets owner of a "famous" mark stop any use that blurs or tarnishes its distinctiveness ( Not Reputation) — even if there is no chance that consumers will be confused. Because the concept of dilution has such potentially broad reach, there are specific defenses in the federal Lanham Act that are applicable to claims of dilution. "All forms of news reporting and news commentary" are exempted, as are comparative advertising, and "noncommercial use". The First Amendment and state constitutional protections for speech provide additional protections for news reporting and commentary.

While I do state certain legal items in my videos and in my text it is up to you to do your own research. I am here to shed some light on a pretty dark subject, but by no way am I responsible for any conclusions you draw from my videos or my information. If you are going to act against someone for anything dealing with a copyright lawsuit. Hire your own attorney and go over your claim in detail with them. The information I provide is to give people an idea of the laws, but not to be the only source on them.

This subject is not over. Until youtube provides me with the proper documentation, we will not be 100% certain that Viacom did this, but all signs to point to them. Youtube still has yet to provide me with the information I have requested.

For the new update, watch my latest video on the subject.

------------------------------ ------
Copyright information: None of my videos are copyrighted, provided that you do not edit the video in any way and do not place any form of advertisement on the video. The video cannot be altered in any way from its published form. If someone wants to re-upload my video on their channel they must put a link to my channel and the original video so people can find the original source for the content. If you have any questions please contact me before downloading my video. Thank you.

The Real Weekly News

August 01, 2008

GJbCWJNQUYI