9/11 physics

2,920 subscribers

504,095 video views

18:15

5 months ago

9/11 Theories: Expert vs. Expert

Why can't the experts get their stories straight?

33,939 views

physicsandreason uploaded

0:09

10 months ago

9/11: Enhanced WTC2 Plane (Park Foreman - PBS)

Park Foreman video of plane hitting WTC South Tower, enhanced to try and make the plane stabile. Just an experiment because I wanted to see if I co...

Xenomorph911WTC • 299 views

physicsandreason subscribed to Xenomorph911WTC

1:04

10 months ago

9/11: Enhanced WTC1 Video (NIST FOIA - CBS-Net Dub6 04)

Some enhancements of WTC North Tower video from NIST FOIA release 14 file "CBS-Net Dub6 04.avi". Download video: http://xenomorph.s3.amazona......

Xenomorph911WTC • 9,933 views

physicsandreason commented:

Perhaps this is one more reason why all the government studies after years of investigation, millions of dollars and thousands of pages, never could explain the actual “collapse mechanism” of the towers, and just “assumed” it was inevitable.

Obvious explosions - or maybe an example of an ever ...

14:09

1 year ago

9/11 Experiments: Eliminate the Impossible

When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.

48,066 views

physicsandreason uploaded

10:57

1 year ago

WTC Modeling Instruction & Testing in the Real World

Here is a overblown but defective description of collapse modeling by a NASA scientist followed a similar real model showing the actual results whi...

psikeyhackr • 2,060 views

physicsandreason liked

1 year ago

physicsandreason commented:

Good job. The only way that the force of a falling body can exceed its static weight,(which IS a force =mg) is to have that falling body decelerate. Force associated with the decel is added to the body’s weight. The total force imposed is dependent on how fast it decelerates. So the KEY ...

9:45

1 year ago

9/11 Experiments: The Mysterious Eutectic Steel

Did rubble from the WTC really cause those eutectic formations ,as we were led to believe?

68,491 views

physicsandreason uploaded

1 year ago

physicsandreason commented:

Kindly refer back to my third comment about experiments, not words. Simply gather all those experts on jref, and conduct some basic experiments that address the source of the sulfur, the uniform acceleration of the towers, the partial freefall of 7, the source of the iron spheres, the fall of t...

10:32

1 year ago

Jonathan Cole - 9/11: Collapse vs Demolition Experiments - AE911Truth.org

How to determine a natural building collapse, from an explosive demolition. 9/11 experiments collapse.

Preview the New AE911Truth.org 9/11 Documen...

ae911truth • 13,785 views

physicsandreason commented:

Correct, uniform acc. does not mean that there was no resistance at all. But it DOES mean that the upward force was (about 66%) LESS than the force needed to support the body’s static weight. Since the undamaged tower below could support the static weight (plus much more), what made it all ...

14:58

1 year ago

Friends of Israel — Enemies Inside the Gates

PLEASE don't use obscene or abusive language in your comment. I have given up trying to monitor them, but I would prefer it if you could be respect...

alawson911 • 91,452 views

physicsandreason commented:

Funny how the President of Iran wants a real investigation, yet those friendly with Israel do not. One would think that those that support the official story would WANT to prove beyond any doubt that "the Muslims" were behind this tragic event. How very odd.

The Friends of Israel doth protest...

0:52

1 year ago

Attempt To Ignite Aluminum (v1)

For aluminum fire shills who refuse to reference or produce a demonstration.

When presented with evidence of a metal fire in the south tower (see...

Bernadotte01 • 277 views

physicsandreason commented:

Good Job. And as you well know, the NIST "theory" that the molten metal from WTC 2 was some sort of mix of Al and office furnishings has also been proven to be experimentally false. That molten metal was steel or iron...meaning that the official "story" of 9/11, is wrong.

9:54

1 year ago

9/11 Experiments: Newton vs. NIST

Does NIST think Newton's laws are only suggestions?

17,984 views

physicsandreason uploaded

1 year ago

physicsandreason commented:

No I am not, but if I were, physics is not a popularity contest. If you think I am wrong, than prove it by experiment. The rules: 1. The lower structure must be able to support the upper structure intitially. 2. The upper structure must constantly accelerate downward and never slow down....

14:29

1 year ago

9/11 Experiments: The Great Thermate Debate

What's wrong with mainstream experts?

259,181 views

physicsandreason uploaded

1 year ago

physicsandreason commented:

Correct....which is why National Geographic and Mythbusters set up their experiments the way they did. Thermate can burn quietly or blow loudly, depending on how its configured/constrained. While the total energy is the same, its really all about focus. However if its focused, the burn can act...