"Capitalism is an economy without force and fraud, or, if you believe this is itself a fraud, an economy that has total adherence to private-property and voluntary exchange thereof.

The Marxists who claim that this itself is fraud (propriety as fraud) have never disproved the contention that society cannot function in productivity without individual minds having agency over recognised property. Their conception of the possibility of exchange and productivity without private property has never been substantiated. Nor has the vague idea that people will spontaneously refrain from claiming individual agency over property, the phenomenon of propriety, ever been even cursorily explained.

Since the Marxist creed gains all its reputation from an intellectual class that considers ownership of capital goods a fraud, we must find in Marxist economic theory, if it is to validate itself, both positive proof of the necessity that capital goods be owned by nebulous collectives (while private property is effectively maintained for goods of the lower order as Marx somewhat contradictorily conceded that these products of capital ought be subject to private propriety upon distribution) not to mention negative proof by counter-argument that this Communist system is sustainable, by a thorough debunking of the empirical observation and theoretically explicable fact that societal groups without presently protected rights of property over capital producer goods tend to fail at achieving any prosperity beyond subsistence save by consequence of previously accumulated capital goods.

Since Marxism is not forthcoming with these important defences of its conclusions (nor do its defenders succeed or even attempt to suggest how we might find such validation of the Marxist labour theories of exploitation by owners of higher order goods) I have concluded that all informed persons ought abandon the whole ideology and its impetus to create law that assaults the propriety of capital owners. This view seems the only remotely reasonable position to take on Marxism given that the allegedly higher living standards of Capitalist societies has passed through the historical laboratory of empirical falsification and veritably it was not private ownership Capitalist society but the USSR whose means of production were to a significant extent, even towards the end of the twentieth century, capital goods in the form of machines produced during the nineteenth century."-NINTENDOMANWILL

"All the services commonly thought to require the State, from the coining of money to police protection to the development of law in defense of rights of person and property can be and have been supplied far more efficiently and certainty more morally by private persons. The State is in no sense required by the nature of man; quite the contrary." -Murray Rothbard

"The lesson I have to teach is this: Leave all creative energies uninhibited. Merely organize society to act in harmony with this lesson. Let society's legal apparatus remove all obstacles the best it can. Permit these creative know-hows freely to flow. Have faith that free men and women will respond to the Invisible Hand. This faith will be confirmed. I, Pencil, seemingly simple though I am, offer the miracle of my creation as testimony that this is a practical faith, as practical as the sun, the rain, a cedar tree, the good earth."-Leonard E. Read, 'I the Pencil'

Ludwig von Mises: "True, governments can reduce the rate of interest in the short run. They can issue additional paper money. They can open the way to credit expansion by the banks. They can thus create an artificial boom and the appearance of prosperity. But such a boom is bound to collapse soon or late and to bring about a depression." - Omnipotent Government

Werner Heisenberg on the importance of logic and a priori deductive reasoning: "It will never be possible by pure reason to arrive at some absolute truth."~ 'Physics and Philosophy'

Michael Savage: "Why don't you grow up and recognise that you've become a collaborator?" - A phone conversation with a 'student' of 'journalism.'

"You mean to say that you poor British can't just walk into a physiotherapist's rooms, get treatment, pay a small sum (about 25 pounds) using your credit card and then go and claim some of that back from your medical insurer? That's the from here in OZ. God, the NHS sounds terrible. When are you Brits going to realise that a service that you don't pay for at time of delivery or by insurance is bound to be rubbish? Are you all so soft that you can't just privatise medicine and get the Government to fund THE PATIENT and not the bloody infrastructure."-

an intelligent Australian whose comments seem diametrically opposed to the sound reason of another particular Australian gentleman who graced us with his sound opinions and reasonable countenance, while claiming to represent the views of an entire, obviously completely homogeneous(!), nation.