Come and find the Truth
Visit www.truthseekers.ws

Additional Prior Truth Seeker Tv Programs Are Uploaded There too!

See Truth Seekers LIVE and call in LIVE ( USA Pacific time Saturday night 7 Pm to 8 PM). call in on specified "live" Saturday nights, at this Internet address:

http://www.ustream.tv/chann...

The following is written by the grey haired fellow in the uploaded videos.

I first read Jesus words in the book of Mathew as a 28 year old Jewish born former agnostic/atheist. By age 28 I had become convinced there must be a spiritual dimension by reading things about Edgar Cayce and books like Carl Jung's "Psyche & Symbol"; and "Be Here Now" by Baba Ram Das (formerly known as Richard Alpert former head of Harvard's department of psychology), the Upanishads, the Gita & the Bhagavadim, etc. I did not know that Einstein had considered Jesus words as the most "divine" that he had ever read. But they were certainly the most divine that I'd ever read. They far surpassed Khalil Gibran's and William Blake and all others.

It is provable fact that Jesus lived in the time of Pilates' rule over Israel, as Jesus enemies wrote about him. The Roman historian Tacitus, writing about 100 A.D. spoke of Jesus being put to death under Pontius Pilate. The Jewish historian Josephus, also writing about 100 A.D. also spoke of Jesus and John the Baptist and Jesus' brother James. The Jewish Talmud says that Jesus was put to death because he was "leading Israel astray" with his "sorcery". So here we have some that wished Jesus had never existed and would have said so, if the opposite wasn't widely known in their days. And the Talmud even testifies as "sorcery" to the miracles Jesus did, such as raising the dead and healing people born blind and deaf and known as blind & deaf since their infancy to all their neighbors. If Jesus had not done these things, the Talmud would have stated so. But the Talmud can only call Jesus healings "sorcery". Just as the New Testament states.

The Roman historians of the time write of Christians as being honest and even though tortured to the death and having the opportunity to save their lives by denying Jesus as Lord, they refused to do so. People do not go, one after another, all willingly to their death for a known lie, like saying that they known the person born blind for their entire life and that they also knew Jesus had healed him. They could have saved their lives and stopped any torture at any time. But they refused to deny what they had seen.

In the Dead Sea Scrolls are large and small segments of most of the Old Testament books. The very same Dead Sea Scroll parchment and goatskin documents that men have touched with their hands in our time, could also have been held in Jesus hands, as most were written prior to Jesus birth (mostly about 100 to 150 years before his birth, as dated by pottery found nearby; dated by coins in the caves, and carbon 14 dating).

Until Bedouin boys first discovered these documents, the oldest known copy of the Old Testament (the Masoretic text), dated to about 1000 A.D. So the Dead Sea Scrolls were more than a thousand years older, most dating to about 100 B.C. And according to the greatest Biblical Archeologist of all time Dr. William Albright (and most other archeologists), even though there are some spelling errors and grammatical mistakes, the content and thoughts expressed are exactly the same as in the Old Testaments that we have today. They were not changed around 600 A.D. as Moslem scholars claim. The Dead Sea Scrolls in our possession today, most existing more than 500 years before Mohammed's birth, state that Isaac was taken to the top of the mountain by Abraham. Not Ishmael.

In the Isaiah copies of the Dead Sea Scrolls (chapter 53), written way before Jesus birth, it states that a man will be rejected by Israel and please God by voluntarily giving up his life as an atonement for the sins of Israel, even though God knew that the man was innocent. And that this man would be condemned unfairly by the courts. The Jewish Rabbis of today usually state that chapter 53 refers to Israel dying for Israel during the Holocaust. This makes no sense as chapter 53 says that this man had no "deceit" in Him while Isaiah chapter 48:1 and elsewhere calls Israel deceitful. Leviticus 17:11 states that "..the life of the flesh is in the blood and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls, for it is the blood that makes an atonement for the soul".




Jesus came, and said he was that man. He also healed the blind and lame and deaf as prophesied to happen in Isaiah 35:4-10. He was born in Bethlehem as prophesied for the Messiah who will "rule" Israel, yet be "smitten, and will "give them up until..." a later time when He shall return as stated in Micah 5:1-4. There is much more fulfilled prophesy about Him. These prophesies and things witnessed by many people could not have been fabricated.