incitebytes
incitebytes's Channel
Alert iconSubscribed
 
 
Sign in or sign up now!
Hello, you either have JavaScript turned off or an old version of Adobe's Flash Player. Get the latest Flash player.
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
incitebytes
Alert iconSubscribed
Loading...
Profile
 
Channel Views:
10,512
Total Upload Views:
425,572
Joined:
Nov 6, 2010
Latest Activity:
2 days ago
Subscribers:
277
Dedicated to exposing Conservative/Republican hypocrisy and dickishness. C'mon, join the fun!

***IF YOU'RE NOT VIEWING THIS ON A 1600 PIXELS WIDE (OR HIGHER) MONITOR, YOU CAN STILL SEE THE FULL BACKGROUND IMAGE BY HOLDING DOWN YOUR CTRL KEY (CMD KEY ON A MAC) AND HITTING YOUR HYPHEN (-) KEY TO ZOOM OUT. CTRL+ EQUALS (=) KEY WILL ZOOM YOU BACK IN.***

The following quotations are excerpted from the widely acclaimed book, "What's The Matter With Kansas? How Conservatives Won The Heart Of America" (2004), by former New York Times and Wall Street Journal columnist (now with Harper's) and best-selling author, Thomas Frank.

[pp. 6-7:] "The leaders of the [Conservative] backlash may talk Christ, but they walk corporate. Values may "matter most" to voters, but they always take a backseat to the needs of money once the elections are won ... This is vexing for observers, and one might expect it to vex the movement's true believers even more. Their grandstanding leaders never deliver, their fury mounts and mounts, and nevertheless they turn out every two years to return their right-wing heroes to office for a second, a third, a twentieth try. The trick never ages; the illusion never wears off. Vote to stop abortion; receive a rollback in capital gains taxes. Vote to make our country strong again; receive deindustrialization. Vote to screw those politically correct college professors; receive electricity deregulation [Enron]. Vote to get government off our backs; receive conglomeration and monopoly everywhere from media to meat- packing. Vote to stand tall against terrorists; receive Social Security privatization. Vote to strike a blow against elitism; receive a social order in which wealth is more concentrated than ever before in our lifetimes, in which workers have been stripped of power and CEOs are rewarded in a manner beyond imagining."

[p. 109:] "In Kansas we merely see an extreme version of this mysterious situation [populism benefiting the rich — think Tea Party]. The angry workers, mighty in their numbers, are marching irreverently against the arrogant. They are laughing at the dainty affectations of the [elite]. They are massing at the gates of Mission Hills, hoisting the black flag, and while the millionaires tremble in their mansions, they are bellowing out their terrifying demands. 'WE ARE HERE,' they scream, 'TO CUT YOUR TAXES.'"
About Me:
 
Combat infantry vet (Americal Div., 11th Lt. Inf. Bde.), retired/recovered lawyer, political observer and sometime activist.
Country:
United States
Occupation:
Small business owner/consultant
Recent Activity  
incitebytes My channel/profile page now features the devastating Newt Gingrich PAC video, "When Mitt Romney Came To Town (1 of 2)" Part 2 can be found at the top of my favorites' list. If you haven't seen it already, I strongly encourage you to visit and watch it.
(2 days ago)
 
 
incitebytes commented on Lawrence O'Donnell Gets Caught "Lying" About Lying Republ... (4 days ago)
"@maconsumner, Oh man, are you kidding me? 55 delegates to the Constitutional Convention were lawyers. Did you even know that? Do you even know what..."   more
 
 
incitebytes commented on Lawrence O'Donnell Gets Caught "Lying" About Lying Republ... (4 days ago)
"Actually, I am more than suggesting that if you haven't studied the Constitution and the Supreme Court cases in law school that you don't know what..."   more
 
 
incitebytes commented on Lawrence O'Donnell Gets Caught "Lying" About Lying Republ... (4 days ago)
"@maconsumner, Ha! No, No, that's not how it works. YOU CITE the sections YOU CLAIM caused the financial crisis and then I'll respond. It's so utter..."   more
 
 
incitebytes commented on Lawrence O'Donnell Gets Caught "Lying" About Lying Republ... (4 days ago)
"@maconsumner, I'm sorry, but it's extremely hard to take you seriously. I cite specific sections of videos, actual empirical findings, etc. to rebu..."   more
 
Channel Comments
propagandadrunken (3 days ago)
YOUR PAGE IS LOOKING BETTER THEN EVER FRIEND BUT I THINK AS THE PRIMARYS CONTINUE ONWARD WE MUST WORK TO EXPOSE RON "THE HITMAN" PAUL AND RICK SENTORAM THEY IS SURGING WITH EVERY NEW POLL THAT HITS AND I FEEL THOSE MAN IS THE MOST DANGEROUS OF ALL THE PPL RUNNING BC THEY ARE PRETENDING TO BE LIBERAL APPEASORS

WE NEED TO REELECT OBAMA TO HAVE HIM CONTINUE THE WORK HE STARTED. I PLEDGE THAT WE SEND UP A PETITION TO HOLD OFF THE ELECTION SO WE CAN ALLOW BARRACK OBAMA TO FINISH THE AMAZING WORK HE HAS STARTED. THE LAST THING WE NEED IS A NEOCON REPUBLIKKKAN COMING IN AND DESTROYING THINGS AGAIN LIKE THE LAST TIME. OPEN UR EYES PPL THIS IS REAL.

OBAMA 2012!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
seamoremonster (4 days ago)
All the best for 2012. Keep up the good work. I have followed some of your debate in the comment section and admire you ability to keep your cool and address the issues. Also thanks for the wonderful content you post. Cheers, Sea.
incitebytes (4 days ago)
To @ObamaDoneInOne below: Gee, where to start? Your illogic, factual errors and faux intellectualism are such rich targets. You've repeatedly called me a "useful idiot," because I'm a partisan who makes fun of Conservs/Repubs (low-hanging fruit for sure), while you think you've reached some exalted plane of political mojo. You expose your clueless hypocrisy by attacking me on partisan grounds (not to mention your screen name, lol). My experience with you phony "I'm above the fray" types is that you're too ignorant/cowardly to argue policy, so you criticize BIG, IMPORTANT THINGS like, "Did I call Limbaugh fat?" (who the fuck cares? Oh, and I never used "girth" either, which btw does not = "fat"). Or, wah! was I unfair in my treatment of Weiner vs. some Republican goof? Like I said before: Unhappy? go whine to the FCC, Fox, mommy, or post your own videos. Answer to your amateur bin Laden "critique": No, it means Obama is competent, because he got bin Laden and the Republicans let him go.
ScarahPhalin (1 week ago)
HAPPY NEW YEAR incitebytes! = )

The GIFT that Keeps on Giving + Making Comedians WEALTHY = RepubliCON DEBATES
ObamaDoneInOne (2 weeks ago)
...and one last thing, nice FAIL on the "Bin Laden" bubble. The "Republican incompetents"...so in your mind he thinks Republicans are incompetent? So does that mean he also thinks Democrats are 'competent', therefore meaning your party has the support of a terrorist?

Whatever makes you happy dear. I love you as always.
ObamaDoneInOne (2 weeks ago)
My problem with you isn't that you're just another 'dern liberal'. It's the fact that you're a blatant, outright hypocrite of the first order. It's the way you present yourself as someone of higher intelligence, but yet are still quick label everybody who disagrees with you as a "FOX" watcher and "Bimbag" listener, along with the "D=Good, R=Bad", "D=Middle Class, R=Big Money" - the same useful idiot ad nauseum.

Just because you yourself are a close-minded buffoon and follow solely along 1 party and are a direct reflection of the Moonbats Spouting Nothing But Crap network doesn't necessarily mean that your opposition is the direct opposite, IE Republitard & FOX watcher. It could mean that there's actually someone out there who realizes that there's useful idiots from both sides of the spectrum, and that's fed up with the "MSDNC vs. FAUX" and "R vs. D" poppycock, and the morons like yourself who keep that shit alive and wonder why our country is so fucked up right now.

Love you.
ObamaDoneInOne (2 weeks ago)
Except for the fact that it's in no way comparable, bc Cain did not do anything as there isn't the slightest bit of evidence other than hearsay; which is understandable as that's all most useful idiots need for "evidence". And that's not condemnation of Weiner, that's your classy attempt-at-comedy way of saying "Even though he's kind of a pervert & a doucher, it's still OK bc he's a 'D'". Condemnation would be uploading videos of the situation much like you did for Cain, with strongly worded titles & descriptions, but that might make you not such a hypocrite.

And you're right. You never used the term "fat". I believe the term used was "girth"; which in your obvious rush to prove what an educated pompous ass you are, probably forgot means pretty much the same thing as, fat? So if I say "Ed Shitz has enormous girth", will you then attempt to agree, rather than making up a lame hypocritical excuse saying that he has a right to be fat because he used to play football? lol, that's amazing.
incitebytes (2 weeks ago)
To @ObamaDoneInOne below: Since I NEVER have (prior to this comment) described Limbaugh on my page as "fat," I can only surmise you have some sort of mental impairment. But, now that you mention it, in addition to Limbaugh being a poorly educated "gas bag" (no dimensions specified), it's pretty obvious that he's a pork-pie fat ass as well. I'm sure most would agree that compared to Limbaugh, Ed Schultz (a former college quarterback), is Arnold freakin' Schwarzenegger.

Apparently, your memory ain't so hot either. Yes, I had Weiner's picture up for quite awhile, but with the caption, "Let me tell you about the Battle of the Bulge -- I lost!" No surprise that level of deft, sophisticated (oh, OK, high-school-level) humor was lost on you, but I think it's directly comparable to my Herman Cain, "If you knew where my hand was ..." word-bubble classic. And hey, if you're looking for "equal time" on my site, go whine/complain to the FCC or Fox, or better yet, post your own stuff, doofus.
ObamaDoneInOne (2 weeks ago)
LOLZ. RUSH BIMBAG IS FAT. LOL. WHAT A FATASS. HAHA. FATNESS.


Oh, but Ed Schultz, girl look at that body. He works out!


MERRY CHRISTMAS AND HAPPY NEW YEAR
ObamaDoneInOne (2 weeks ago)
To the average "Republican" moron, you do appear as this unbeatable contradiction to any right-wing opposition, with your grandiloquent vocabulary and stylistic platitudes. Unfortunately, to a semi-educated free-thinking independent such as myself, your hypocrisy and lack of substance in said platitudes is as obvious as a sunflower in a bed of roses.

You're this "master exposer of *Republican* hypocrisy & dickishness"? So you go after an innocent cancer survivor like Herman Cain with unproven hearsay, simply because he's an "R", but yet promote a doucher like Anthony Weiner, who if I remember correctly was a member of your "Wall of Shame" not that long ago? What about the other winners in your "party", like John Edwards and Bill Clinton? Don't they deserve a chance in the spot light as well?

Nothing like a first class hypocrite claiming to *expose* hypocrites. Merry Christmas, friend.
Alert icon
Alert icon
Alert icon
Alert icon
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more