The Statistics and Data function allow a limited, but useful overview of how people find a video. When for example I have a whole swag of a hundred or more hate messages and I see COLLYYRE just sent a couple of hundred views to my channel, guess what I am inclined to deduce?

The crimes being committed by the Chosen Ones, in trying to deflect from their crimes and run interference for crimes against humanity, war crimes and breaches of international human rights law, amount to serious breaches of the criminal code and have very serious consequences for those who instigate or incite for example an assault upon my person which is a very real possibility. Thanks to the permanent record nature of the net, we know that certain You Tube personalities, specifically JIDF ringleaders are directly responsible for sites involved in slander, privacy invasion, blackmail, death threats, stalking and harassment. Thanks to Youtube features, I can say with complete assurance, for I have the proof in my hand, that these JIDF personalities who have sent these DEATH SQUADS as I refer ironically to them, are directly culpable in any actual violence which should be carried out, that they are directly responsible for the massive number of death threats and remarkably disgusting hatred and abuse posts and phone calls I get.

Of course an investigation, which any charges they or I or the police might want to lay; would entail, would involve full disclosure by Google of the IP addresses of all concerned and I have a suspicion that more than a few of the ugly messages were made by those same people, using sock puppet accounts.

A selection of the abusive posts is provided on several videos and have to be seen to be believed. I did not alter a single word, they are exactly as the Chosen Ones posted them and there WERE no decent posts at all, amongst them. In 600 posts, only three Israelis showed a bit of human decency and they all got along fine with me.

"18 U.S.C. § 875(c) makes it a US federal crime to transmit a threat . . . to injure the person of another via interstate commerce, and using emails to issue such true threats satisfies this requirement. To establish a "true threat," some courts have held that the government must prove that the maker of the threat reasonably should have foreseen that statement he uttered would be taken as threat by those to whom it was made. See, e.g., United States v. Fulmer, 108 F.3d 1486, 1491 (1st Cir. Mass. 1997). (So, for example, a trial court held that it was legally permissible to try someone who had, among other things emailed a college dean saying You will die soon, mother f****r. But you will watch your son die first" and a professor saying "You are on the death list!" United States v Xiang Li, 537 F Supp 2d 431 (2008, ND NY))" (less info)