Profile
Channel Views:
3,070
Total Upload Views:
5,776
Age:
24
Joined:
June 22, 2010
Last Sign In:
1 day ago
Subscribers:
231
Website:
Country:
Canada
Recent Activity
|
|
AntiBSMan liked a video
A rebuttal to PPSimmons recent videos on his perceived connection betwee...
more
|
|
|
|
AntiBSMan favorited a video
My overall rating : 5.9 / 10
Rating per categories, 10 being maximum of p... more |
|
|
|
AntiBSMan liked a video
My overall rating : 5.9 / 10
Rating per categories, 10 being maximum of p... more |
|
|
|
AntiBSMan subscribed to CrissReviews
|
|
|
|
AntiBSMan liked a video
i am of course 100% opposed to the concept of the burqa as a sociologica...
more
|
|
Subscriptions
(11)









Re-watch my videos then. I plainly said on 2 occasions that your intentions are irrelevant to me, so I wasn;t accusing you of any malicious intent. My only concern is & always was with your "culture intolerance" talking points not belonging in a video response to me. They annoyed because you have a bunch of culture drones on your end. If you had actually covered the substance of my "1 law for all" counterarguments, then it wouldn't have been as dreadful.
"you *also* did things that i could classify as misrepresenting me but instead of getting all bent out of shape about it, i simply stated 'thats not what i said' then outlined what my argument was"
If you follow our "point for point" video exchange line carefully enough, you'll see how every point I raised towards you does fit what preceded it. I'll go over all of it on skype with you, if you want.
Whether you did it intentionally or not is irrelevant. By responding to someone who thinks it was intentional, in the manner in which you responded to them (on my page mind you), you give off the impression that you covered the substance of my 6 parter well, but it was handled poorly by you (intentionally or not) as explained in my last 3 vids & comments below. Going around saying that "oh yeah, prove it" despite me having already proved it, is tedious. What I didn't prove, was whether or not it was an intentional distortion. I didn't prove this because I don't care whether it was or it wasn't. It was a poor response that didn't address the essence of the 6 parter. End of.
I'm fed up with this shit Ben. And this is not even getting into my 30 second off topic rant, which I was kind enough to let you have the last word on, and leave your insane accusation hanging in the air by not uploading Part 4 in which I dealt with it.
""no.. wont.. do.. it... must.... breath...... aaaand relax...""
Doing this myself now, actually.
So, for the very LAST time:
1. Instead of dealing with my "one law for all" argument, you made it all about culture intolerance. When you do this in direct response to someone, without so much as mentioning that they argued for something completely different to what you're arguing against, you do end up misrepresenting your opponent. To deny this is madness.
2. "It seems ABM wants to wipe religion off the face of the planet". Reckless assumption.
3. "Fear & Ignorance". Non-factor to my argument, which is what you were responding to.
4. "Teachers acclimate, not kids" Not what you said in your initial comments you left on the ABM vid.
I can go on & on, but I won't, since it's already all there: Re-fucking-watch my last 3 videos to you.
but while yr talkin about shady tactics.. no.. wont.. do.. it... must.... breath...... aaaand relax...